1. Health
You can opt-out at any time. Please refer to our privacy policy for contact information.
Dawn Stacey M.Ed, LMHC

The GOP: "Griping Old Politicians" - Quit Your Crying and Get Real

By February 10, 2012

Follow me on:

Today, the White House has chosen to alter its healthcare mandate after Republicans decided to wage a war over it. Just to recap, in response to thousands of petitions and pleas from people around the country (including the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice and the National Council of Jewish Women), last month the Obama administration announced its modification to the new Affordable Care Act declaring that all religious-affiliated employers, with the exception of churches and other houses of worship, would have to cover free birth control as part of routine preventive care for women. This was seen as a victory all of the country -- that regardless to where a woman was employed, she would have access to affordable and effective birth control.

However, in an attempt mend their fractured party and rally their base, the Republicans decided that THIS would be the issue to bring their party together... crying that it's not fair that religiously affiliated organizations, like hospitals and universities, be required by our federal government to purchase insurance policies that violate their religious and moral convictions. Seriously? Of ALL the issues to claim unjust, THIS is the one the GOP decides to battle over? I guess these politicians don't think it's unfair that millions of Americans are upside on their mortgages, can't find work, face inequities in tax rates (favoring the wealthy) and the list goes on. Yet, they decide to wage a fight over women's access to contraception? Did I miss something here... we aren't even talking about the more heated issue of abortion? There is no disputing the FACTS that contraception use is associated with better women's health, higher marital satisfaction, lower birth rates, less unplanned pregnancies and abortion (and this lists goes on as well).

So what if these religious organizations are obliged to follow the Affordable Care Act? When you think about it, not all of their employees may share the same religious objections to contraception. Is it fair that, for example, the only place a nonreligious woman can find a job is as a janitor at a Catholic university and because of her place of employment, cannot receive the contraception she needs and can't afford? And even if the employees are of the same faith, it has been clearly demonstrated that women of faith do not usually "buy into" the Church's stance on contraception prohibition. Does the GOP not get that 99% of women use birth control during their reproductive years, and that religious women (including those who are Catholic) use contraception at practically the same rate as the general population (with only about 2% of Catholic women relying on natural family planning)? Let's get real... whose interests are the Republicans looking out for? Seems to me that they care more about uniting their party than the health of thousands of women. Are we to believe that no Republican politicians use birth control? Or are they okay that as long as their insurance plans are covering their contraception, its okay to fight for other people to not have coverage? I don't see the GOP objecting to insurance coverage of Viagra -- does anybody else see the problem here?

Anyway, today the White House came back with a solution to this religious clause (which should hopefully shut the GOP up for a little while). The Obama administration announced that religious employers will not have to extend free access to contraception, but that insurance companies will have to. Basically, women who want birth control will still be able to get it free of co-pays or premiums, but universities, hospitals and other institutions with religious affiliations can decline to cover it, leaving the woman's insurance company with the responsibility of coverage.

At a press briefing, President Obama discussed the new mandate,

"No woman's health should depend on who she is or where she works or how much money she makes... Under the rule, women will still have access to free preventive care that includes contraceptive service no matter where they work... That core principle remains. But if a woman's employer is a charity or a hospital that has a religious objection to providing contraceptive services as part of their health plan, the insurance company, not the hospital, not the charity, will be required to reach out and offer the woman contraceptive care free of charge without co-pays, without hassle."

Alright, so the president is honoring the principle of religious liberty -- something that he explains, "As a citizen and as a Christian, I cherish this right." I am okay with this. Am I happy that his administration was forced into a hole and that in order to stay true to the First Amendment and get these zealous GOP leaders off their back, the administration was basically forced to make accommodations... no! However, all women will still have access to vital preventative services and free contraception and, at the end of the day, that's what is REALLY important. Plus, the White House didn't completely cave.

GOP leaders like Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, didn't really get what they TRULY wanted... the removal of all contraception mandated coverages. Can you even imagine what the US would be like if women didn't have affordable birth control to use? We wouldn't see another 3% decline in the national birth rate, that's for sure. Yet, while he was governor of Massachusetts, Mr. Romney proudly declares in a Feb. 9 press release that, "the legislation in our state that related to providing contraception and sterilization, those kinds of things, in insurance, occurred before I was governor and my effort as governor was to try and remove those things." ("Those kind of things"... really Mitt? Are we in kindergarten?) He also endorses, "The Romney Vision: A Record of Promoting Abstinence, Not Sex Education" ... as governor, he released $1 million in federal funds to a faith-based organization (let's not even talk about those violated First Amendment rights you are crying about) to teach abstinence in schools OVER comprehensive sex education. We all know by now that abstinence-only programs do NOT work, and teens need more than abstinence lectures. Yet, it is pretty clear that he does not support contraception and views it as the "ultimate corruptor".

Plus, Mr. Romney has said, "What is it about America's culture and values that makes us such a successful nation and society? Part of that is we love liberty..."  And, as long as we are on the subject, let's look at a few more of Mr. Romney's thoughts -- as they are reflective of so many in his political party:

"My own view is clear. I stand with the Catholic Bishops and all religious organizations in their strenuous objection to this liberty- and conscience-stifling regulation. I understand that my views on laws governing abortion set me in the minority in our Commonwealth. I am pro-life. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. And of course this effort with regards to contraception and the day after pill, and sterilization is an outrageous assault on religious conscience in this country" (From press releases on Feb. 8 and Feb. 9, 2012).

Mr. Romney, did you ever think about WHY the people of America do NOT agree with you and thus why the US laws don't mirror your beliefs? My advice to Mr. Romney and the rest of the GOP, get your facts straight. Political office is NOT your platform to promote your own view, but rather about acting in the best interests of the American people. Remember the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment... that Congress and government are not allowed to display the preference of one religion over another, OR religion over non-religion? And allowing women affordable access to contraception (contraception that has all been FDA-approved)... whatever they need, should not only be protected, it is what the women of America WANT. You said so yourself, Mr. Romney, the "American people love liberty", so WHY are you and your fellow GOP leaders so intent to strip that away from thousands of women? Given the number of religious women who use contraception reliably in this country and cherish this opportunity, maybe it is only YOUR "religious conscience" that has deemed contraception access as an "outrageous assault" (and perhaps maybe the Pope's)...

| FREE Contraception Newsletter |Twitter | Facebook| Share Your Stories or Tips | Contraception Forum |

Photo Courtesy of Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Comments
February 10, 2012 at 10:02 pm
(1) Frank says:

Very nicely done, Dawn. Shame on you GOP!

February 11, 2012 at 1:34 am
(2) Crystal says:

I couldn’t agree with you more, Dawn. Thank you for having the guts to write what so many of us women are thinking. If you ask me, the republicans are just reaching at any straw they can. By making an issue over this clause, they have managed to waste a lot of time and money. Where is the same vigor for real issues – like why I am in foreclosure right now? But, hey the Churches don’t need to pay for contraception. Yipee, GOP – pat yourselves on the back. You made a lot of headway with this one. Maybe you might just get around to solving real problems one day.

February 11, 2012 at 1:44 am
(3) Jacob says:

You go girl! Let me just say that my wife works as a food preparer at a Catholic hospital. We happen to be Catholic, but like so many other women of faith, my wife uses the pill. We can’t afford to have another child right now. It would have been a travesty if she couldn’t have affordable access to her pill as it would be too expensive on our limited salaries to pay outright. Sadly, I am a republican and it is exactly these types of shenanigans that make me embarrassed for my party and my country. It always amazes me when some of these GOP leaders become so tunnel-visioned and so focused on religious doctrine that they FORGET about who they are SERVING and the needs of the US people. It would be nice to hear of them actually looking out for us instead of using their positions to spread such lofty ideals that have no place in the real world. I feel that the White House’s original stance was correct – the president was looking out for the health of all women. If you ask me (and yes, I am a church going man), a good leader will do what he/she can to protect the masses rather than wage a battle that is in the interests of so few. I am begging you, my fellow republicans, get your heads out of the clouds and focus on the bigger picture, real issues, ones that actually count. Its no wonder the party is so derailed right now. It sickens me.

March 3, 2012 at 5:10 pm
(4) Bob says:

I am not an expert of this subject by any means but it seems to me that this argument has nothing to do with contraception access at any level. The issue as I see it is, can the federal goverment force a private employer to provide and pay for a product? What if there was a study that said you were 10 times less likely to be involved in an accident and be injured if you drive a bright yellow Toyota Corrola. The federal goverment (really just one person since they bypassed most of the federal goverment) then said all employers are required by law to provide a yellow Toyota Corrola because it’s safer. And….must pay for it because we know in the long run it will save us hypothetical ER visits and hypothetical money. Like I said I have no stake in the current argument as I am older, married and my wife and I have had our children. I would say if the pills were prescribed for some medical condition such as regulation of cycles then cover it as you do any other medication. I don’t know that I as king would say it’s free to all but some of you will pay for that.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.

We comply with the HONcode standard
for trustworthy health
information: verify here.